论文标题
K2银河考古计划数据版本2:运动4、6和7的Asteroseiscic结果
The K2 Galactic Archaeology Program Data Release 2: Asteroseismic results from campaigns 4, 6, & 7
论文作者
论文摘要
银河结构和进化的研究从Gaia运动学信息中受益匪浅,尽管需要其他固有的恒星参数(例如年龄)才能最好地限制银河系模型。 Asterosemology是为现场星人群提供此类信息的最精确方法,但是在大多数情况下,现有样本仅限于Corot和Kepler任务的一些狭窄视野。为了在银河系位置上提供广泛的特征恒星参数,我们介绍了K2银河考古学计划(GAP)的红色巨型星号参数的第二个数据释放。我们根据六个独立管道分析提供$ν_ {\ mathrm {max}} $和$Δν$;从机器学习中的第一红色巨型分支(RGB)和红色团块(RC)进化状态分类;以及现成的半径和质量系数,$κ_r$&$κ_M$,如果将其适当地乘以太阳尺度的有效温度因子,则产生物理恒星Radii和Masses。我们总共报告了4395个半径和质量系数,典型的不确定性为$ 3.3 \%\ Mathrm {\(stat。)} \ pm 1 \%\%\%\%\%\%\ Mathrm {\(syst。(syst。 (Syst。)} $ for $κ_M$在RGB星星中,$ 5.0 \%\ Mathrm {\(stat。)} \ pm 1 \%\%\%\%\ Mathrm {\(syst。(syst。)} $ for $κ_r$和$κ_r$和$ 10.5 \%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\%\ m arm { (Syst。)} $ for $κ_M$中的RC星星。我们验证样品几乎完成了 - 除了$ν_ {\ mathrm {max}}} \ Lessim10-20μ$ Hz的恒星缺乏,与银河模型和视觉检查相比。我们的Anteroseismic Radii同意RADARAXES的RADII一致,RGB恒星的RADARAXES 2视差在$ 2.2 \ pm 0.3 \%$以内,RC恒星的$ 2.0 \ pm 0.6 \%$。
Studies of Galactic structure and evolution have benefitted enormously from Gaia kinematic information, though additional, intrinsic stellar parameters like age are required to best constrain Galactic models. Asteroseismology is the most precise method of providing such information for field star populations $\textit{en masse}$, but existing samples for the most part have been limited to a few narrow fields of view by the CoRoT and Kepler missions. In an effort to provide well-characterized stellar parameters across a wide range in Galactic position, we present the second data release of red giant asteroseismic parameters for the K2 Galactic Archaeology Program (GAP). We provide $ν_{\mathrm{max}}$ and $Δν$ based on six independent pipeline analyses; first-ascent red giant branch (RGB) and red clump (RC) evolutionary state classifications from machine learning; and ready-to-use radius & mass coefficients, $κ_R$ & $κ_M$, which, when appropriately multiplied by a solar-scaled effective temperature factor, yield physical stellar radii and masses. In total, we report 4395 radius and mass coefficients, with typical uncertainties of $3.3\% \mathrm{\ (stat.)} \pm 1\% \mathrm{\ (syst.)}$ for $κ_R$ and $7.7\% \mathrm{\ (stat.)} \pm 2\% \mathrm{\ (syst.)}$ for $κ_M$ among RGB stars, and $5.0\% \mathrm{\ (stat.)} \pm 1\% \mathrm{\ (syst.)}$ for $κ_R$ and $10.5\% \mathrm{\ (stat.)} \pm 2\% \mathrm{\ (syst.)}$ for $κ_M$ among RC stars. We verify that the sample is nearly complete -- except for a dearth of stars with $ν_{\mathrm{max}} \lesssim 10-20μ$Hz -- by comparing to Galactic models and visual inspection. Our asteroseismic radii agree with radii derived from Gaia Data Release 2 parallaxes to within $2.2 \pm 0.3\%$ for RGB stars and $2.0 \pm 0.6\%$ for RC stars.