论文标题
评论和纠正：在越来越同意压力的情况下，意见动态
A Comment on and Correction to: Opinion dynamics in the presence of increasing agreement pressure
论文作者
论文摘要
我们确定了给出的共识结果的反示例[J。 Semonsen等。意见动力在越来越多的一致压力的情况下。 \ textit {ieee trans。网络。}，49（4）：1270-1278，2018]。我们通过用Banach固定点定理的新变化在给定参考中替换引理5来解决反示例，该变化既解释了参考文献中的数值结果，又解释了本注释中的反例，并提供了足够的条件，可以在系统中随着同伴压力的增加而达成共识。这项工作与使用Semonsen等人使用的证明技术的其他论文有关。并确定其索赔的真实性，假设有新的条件。
We identify a counter-example to the consensus result given in [J. Semonsen et al. Opinion dynamics in the presence of increasing agreement pressure. \textit{IEEE Trans. Cyber.}, 49(4): 1270-1278, 2018]. We resolve the counter-example by replacing Lemma 5 in the given reference with a novel variation of the Banach Fixed Point theorem which explains both the numerical results in the reference and the counter-example(s) in this note, and provides a sufficient condition for consensus in systems with increasing peer-pressure. This work is relevant for other papers that have used the proof technique from Semonsen et al. and establishes the veracity of their claims assuming the new sufficient condition.
