论文标题
可再现的工作流程
Reproducible Workflow
论文作者
论文摘要
可重复性始终被确定为科学研究的重要组成部分。尽管关于可重复性的重要性以及其他常用的“ R”术语（即可复制性，可重复性等）有一个普遍的共识，但在这些术语的使用方面存在一些分歧，包括研究界不同部分使用的相互矛盾的定义。在这篇百科全书的文章中，我们探讨了科学文献中使用的不同定义（特别是计算研究），是否需要单个标准化定义并根据非功能性要求提供替代方案。我们还描述了可重复性（以及其他R）在科学工作流程中的作用。
Reproducibility has been consistently identified as an important component of scientific research. Although there is a general consensus on the importance of reproducibility along with the other commonly used 'R' terminology (i.e., Replicability, Repeatability etc.), there is some disagreement on the usage of these terms, including conflicting definitions used by different parts of the research community. In this encyclopedia article, we explore the different definitions used in scientific literature (specifically pertaining to computational research), whether there is a need for a single standardized definition and provide an alternative based on non-functional requirements. We also describe the role of reproducibility (and other R's) in scientific workflows.
