论文标题
在网络集合中学习共同的结构。食物网的申请
Learning common structures in a collection of networks. An application to food webs
论文作者
论文摘要
让网络集合代表几个(社会或生态)系统中的交互。我们追求两个目标:确定网络之间共同存在的拓扑结构中的相似性,并将集合聚类为结构均匀网络的子收集。我们使用基于概率模型的方法来解决这两个问题。我们提出了适应网络集合的联合建模的随机块模型(SBM)的扩展。集合中的网络被认为是SBM的独立实现。通用的连通性结构是通过某些参数的平等施加的。用变异期望最大化(EM)算法估算模型参数。我们得出了一个临时惩罚的可能性标准,以选择块数量并评估不同网络结构之间共识的适当性。同样的标准也可以根据其连接结构来聚集网络。因此,它将集合的分区分为结构均匀网络的子集。我们的主张的相关性在两个生态网络集合中进行了评估。首先,在三个溪流食品网中的应用揭示了其结构的同质性以及不同生态系统中扮演同等生态作用的物种组之间的对应关系。此外,联合分析允许对较小网络的结构进行更精细的分析。其次,我们根据其连通性结构将67个食物网聚集,并证明五个中尺度结构足以描述该集合。
Let a collection of networks represent interactions within several (social or ecological) systems. We pursue two objectives: identifying similarities in the topological structures that are held in common between the networks and clustering the collection into sub-collections of structurally homogeneous networks. We tackle these two questions with a probabilistic model based approach. We propose an extension of the Stochastic Block Model (SBM) adapted to the joint modeling of a collection of networks. The networks in the collection are assumed to be independent realizations of SBMs. The common connectivity structure is imposed through the equality of some parameters. The model parameters are estimated with a variational Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm. We derive an ad-hoc penalized likelihood criterion to select the number of blocks and to assess the adequacy of the consensus found between the structures of the different networks. This same criterion can also be used to cluster networks on the basis of their connectivity structure. It thus provides a partition of the collection into subsets of structurally homogeneous networks. The relevance of our proposition is assessed on two collections of ecological networks. First, an application to three stream food webs reveals the homogeneity of their structures and the correspondence between groups of species in different ecosystems playing equivalent ecological roles. Moreover, the joint analysis allows a finer analysis of the structure of smaller networks. Second, we cluster 67 food webs according to their connectivity structures and demonstrate that five mesoscale structures are sufficient to describe this collection.