论文标题
用身体模拟飞机空气动力学:非平面机翼的执行器线方法
Simulating Airplane Aerodynamics with Body Forces: Actuator Line Method for Non-planar Wings
论文作者
论文摘要
使用执行器线方法(ALM)模拟固定翼飞机的两种典型配置:带有翼和T尾的机翼。 ALM在转子模拟中广泛使用,以按身体力对叶片进行建模,该刀片是根据翼型数据和相对流速度计算得出的。尽管该方法的优势是允许更粗糙的网格,但该方法尚未用于模拟飞机空气动力学。这可能会归功于未校正的ALM无法准确预测机翼尖端附近的力,即使是简单的配置也是如此。最近基于涡旋的涂片校正显示出改善的结果,表明这些局限性是过去的一部分。对于这项工作中研究的非平面构型,在表面交叉点附近观察到具有原始涂抹校正和非线性提升线方法(LL)的ALM之间的差异,因为数值模拟中产生的循环与计算的校正循环相差。提出了涡度幅度校正,从而改善了ALM和LL之间的一致性。这种二阶校正可以解决用于定义升力力的速度的歧义。良好的结果表明,改进的ALM可用于飞机空气动力学,其精度类似于LL。
Two configurations typical of fixed-wing aircraft are simulated with the actuator line method (ALM): a wing with winglets and a T-tail. The ALM is extensively used in rotor simulations to model the blades by body forces, which are calculated from airfoil data and the relative flow velocity. This method has not been used to simulate airplane aerodynamics, despite its advantage of allowing coarser grids. This may be credited to the failure of the uncorrected ALM to accurately predict forces near the tip of wings, even for simple configurations. The recently-proposed vortex-based smearing correction shows improved results, suggesting those limitations are part of the past. For the non-planar configurations studied in this work, differences between the ALM with the original smearing correction and a non-linear lifting line method (LL) are observed near the intersection of surfaces, because the circulation generated in the numerical simulation differs from the calculated corrected circulation. A vorticity magnitude correction is proposed, which improves the agreement between ALM and LL. This second-order correction resolves the ambiguity in the velocity used to define the lift force. The good results indicate that the improved ALM can be used for airplane aerodynamics, with an accuracy similar to the LL.