论文标题
临床前扩散MRI的ISMRM扩散研究组的考虑和建议:第2部分 - 离体成像:附加值和获取
Considerations and recommendations from the ISMRM Diffusion Study Group for preclinical diffusion MRI: Part 2 -- Ex vivo imaging: added value and acquisition
论文作者
论文摘要
临床前扩散MRI(DMRI)的值很大。虽然DMRI可以在组织中对组织进行非侵入性表征,但越来越多地用于探测组织微观结构和脑连接性。与体内研究相比,离体DMRI具有多个实验优势,包括更高的信噪比和空间分辨率,并实现了更高级的扩散对比。离体DMRI的另一个主要优点是与组织学数据作为方法学验证的直接比较。但是,执行离体实验时必须有许多考虑。组织制备,图像获取和处理以及结果解释的步骤很复杂,决策不仅与小动物的体内成像有很大不同,而且最终会影响使用数据可以回答的问题。这项工作代表了临床前DMRI的一系列建议和注意事项的“第2部分”。我们描述了离体组织DMRI的最佳实践,重点是体内成像增加了DMRI领域的值以及在体内图像采集中的考虑。我们给出一般的考虑和基础知识,在设计实验时必须考虑这些知识。我们描述了标本和模型的差异,并讨论了为什么有些人或多或少适合不同的研究。然后,我们提供了离体方案的指南,包括组织固定,样品制备和MR扫描。在每个部分中,我们都试图提供指南和建议,但也突出显示不存在准则的领域(原因)以及未来的工作应该在哪里。本文的一个总体目标是增强离体DMRI获取和分析的严格性和可重复性,从而提高生物医学知识。
The value of preclinical diffusion MRI (dMRI) is substantial. While dMRI enables in vivo non-invasive characterization of tissue, ex vivo dMRI is increasingly used to probe tissue microstructure and brain connectivity. Ex vivo dMRI has several experimental advantages including higher signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution compared to in vivo studies, and enabling more advanced diffusion contrasts. Another major advantage of ex vivo dMRI is the direct comparison with histological data as a methodological validation. However, there are a number of considerations that must be made when performing ex vivo experiments. The steps from tissue preparation, image acquisition and processing, and interpretation of results are complex, with decisions that not only differ dramatically from in vivo imaging of small animals, but ultimately affect what questions can be answered using the data. This work represents "Part 2" of a 3-part series of recommendations and considerations for preclinical dMRI. We describe best practices for dMRI of ex vivo tissue, with a focus on the value that ex vivo imaging adds to the field of dMRI and considerations in ex vivo image acquisition. We give general considerations and foundational knowledge that must be considered when designing experiments. We describe differences in specimens and models and discuss why some may be more or less appropriate for different studies. We then give guidelines for ex vivo protocols, including tissue fixation, sample preparation, and MR scanning. In each section, we attempt to provide guidelines and recommendations, but also highlight areas for which no guidelines exist (and why), and where future work should lie. An overarching goal herein is to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of ex vivo dMRI acquisitions and analyses, and thereby advance biomedical knowledge.